As one of my recent posts might suggest, I'm not a fan of what one of Murdoch's papers have done. I don't read The Times, Sun or NOTW and I'm going to be ditching my Sky box soon.
But I still don't really understand what the big deal is with Murdoch owning Sky.
OK, I can see that someone owning influential media is a big deal, that they can report for or against one party, and perhaps not having them owning all the newspapers is a good idea. Is that affected by Sky? Well, no. He's not going to own Sky News anyway.
Or, if he was doing something that would reduce competition, that might be a bad thing. Is this deal reducing competition? Err... no.
Does Sky therefore have control over say, oil, food or spice? No. It's movies, footie and bought-in US TV shows. Anyone can live without them (as I'm about to do).
So, why is this such a big deal?
US taxpayer funded health spending vs NHS
1 hour ago