Dr Lal said: ‘We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was “grey literature” [material not published in a peer-reviewed journal]. But it was never picked up by any of the authors in our working group, nor by any of the more than 500 external reviewers, by the governments to which it was sent, or by the final IPCC review editors.’
I'm sorry, but I don't think it goes too far than to describe this story as dynamite.
All these scientists who know better about climate change completely missed something in a report which had no scientific basis whatsoever? Every single one of them? Yet we're supposed to make a mulit-zillion dollar decision based on their judgement?